On Friday 28 January 2005 19:23, Richard S. Crawford wrote: >On Friday 28 January 2005 4:09 pm, Jeff Kinz flailed at a keyboard > and > >produced this: >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:03:13PM -0800, Richard S. Crawford wrote: >> > I certainly wasn't advocating spoofing the useragent string >> > *all* the > >time. > >> > Only on those few sites that say they require IE, when they >> > really > >don't. My > >> > bank's pretty good at making their website standards compliant, >> > so I can > >get > >> > to it with any browser, but there is one other site I visit >> > frequently > >that > >> > says it requires NS or IE, even though it works perfectly well >> > in Firefox. Again, I've written to the webmaster about this, >> > but to no avail. >> >> Richard, What is the other site? Let the list know. If every >> one here visits it once, the number of non-IE browsers in their >> log files will be astounding. And all we have to do is click the >> link in your email. >> >> Think of it as a grass roots campaign. Lets see what affect it >> has. >> >> What's the URL? > >Ah, good point. That would be http://www.weightwatchers.com email objecting to it has been delivered. I like this idea, pester the hell out of these weenies. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.32% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
