On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:24:30 +0000, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Roger Grosswiler wrote: > > Paul Howarth wrote: > >> You'd probably want this then: > >> > >> option static-route 192.168.1.0 10.0.0.3, > >> 192.168.2.0 10.0.0.3, > >> 192.168.3.0 10.0.0.3; > >> > >> However, it probably won't work; if you look at > >> http://www.gsp.com/cgi-bin/man.cgi?section=5&topic=dhcp-options it says: > >> > >> Also, please note that this option is not intended for classless IP > >> routing - it does not include a subnet mask. Since classless IP > >> routing is now the most widely deployed routing standard, this option > >> is virtually useless, and is not implemented by any of the popular > >> DHCP clients, for example the Microsoft DHCP client. > > > > thats exactly what i tried before, but it even did not work on fedora > > core. This will mean, i have to make some kind of hack the get the > > routing fixed in the routing table. I'm gonna write a very little > > shell-script and let it execute on boot-up. I think, on windoze i can > > indicate them also as fixed route per client. :-( It would have been > > luxury... > > You don't need to script this on linux. Assuming you've only got one NIC > on your clients (eth0), create a file on each client called > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth0 that contains the following: > > 192.168.1.0/24 via 10.0.0.3 > 192.168.2.0/24 via 10.0.0.3 > 192.168.3.0/24 via 10.0.0.3 > > That should have the desired effect. > > Paul. If there is only one NIC on the clients, and if the default gateway is at 10.0.0.3, then how is this any different than setting 10.0.0.3 to the default gw?
