Re: Used swap 0MB of 0MB - why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Used swap 0MB of 0MB - why?
From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:15:47 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127)

Duncan Lithgow wrote:

Neither swapon nor mkswap are recognised by my bash terminal. I get a lot of that trying to follow what people suggest - is something wrong with that too!?

You've probably got the wrong PATH setting, by using "su" to become root instead of "su -".

Paul.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Used swap 0MB of 0MB - why?
  - From: Duncan Lithgow

References:
- Used swap 0MB of 0MB - why?
  - From: Duncan Lithgow
- Re: Used swap 0MB of 0MB - why?
  - From: Steven Tully
- Re: Used swap 0MB of 0MB - why?
  - From: Duncan Lithgow

Prev by Date: Re: Used swap 0MB of 0MB - why?
Next by Date: Re: via-rhine or via_rhine ?
Previous by thread: Re: Used swap 0MB of 0MB - why?
Next by thread: Re: Used swap 0MB of 0MB - why?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]