Re: DoveCot vs Cyrus-Imapd Performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Fr, den 14.01.2005 schrieb Les Mikesell um 15:04:

> > 1) cyrus is hard to administer/install
> > 2) cyrus has lesser possibilities
> 
> No exactly.  It's more that
> 1) Cyrus doesn't integrate closely with unix/linux user accounts which
> may or may not be a good thing.  If you are an ISP providing email only
> you may want that.  If you are an office providing file/ftp/print, etc.
> services for all the same users you may double your setup work per user.

>   Les Mikesell

I don't share the second part that opinion. SASLv2 - meanwhile used by
modern MTAs as well Cyrus-IMAPd - has enough options to use existing
users. And by using the autocreate option (patched in) you will have no
handwork to create the mailboxes manually.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.10-1.8_FC2smp 
Serendipity 15:38:08 up 3 days, 13:48, load average: 0.24, 0.57, 0.57 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux