Re: Why does the new NetworkManager require bind and namecaching server?

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Why does the new NetworkManager require bind and namecaching server?
• From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:29:13 +0100
• In-reply-to: <1105650700.4111.9.camel@FC3Work>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <1105650700.4111.9.camel@FC3Work>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Am Do, den 13.01.2005 schrieb Wayne Steenburg um 22:11:

> I noticed this will doing a apt-get upgrade and located the offending
> package.
> 
> [root@FC3Work wayne]# apt-get install NetworkManager
[ ... ]
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   bind caching-nameserver

> Wayne Steenburg

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2005-January/msg00316.html

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.10-1.8_FC2smp 
Serendipity 22:28:22 up 2 days, 20:39, load average: 1.63, 1.00, 0.93 

• References:
  • Why does the new NetworkManager require bind and namecaching server?
    • From: Wayne Steenburg

• Prev by Date: Re: Nervious wannabe new user asks for advice.
• Next by Date: Re: /etc/X11/gdm/PostLogin/Default
• Previous by thread: Why does the new NetworkManager require bind and namecaching server?
• Next by thread: FC3: Cyrus-IMAPD. Sieve authentication does not work
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread