Re: qmail inclusion in official release of FC4?

[Aly Dharshi <aly.dharshi@xxxxxxxxx>]

The more and more that I think about it I feel that it should be put in a repo 
such as that of Dag or ATrpms. I think that there are better modern smtp servers 
out there that do a lot more stuff than Qmail and prolly more efficiently with 
things built in, Exim comes to mind for one. Exiscan patch is being integrated 
into main stream Exim so it should be ninja cool.

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:41:03 -0700, Aly Dharshi <aly.dharshi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Qmail has been fairly stationary in its development. I wonder if these shouldn't
> > just be part of a repo as opposed to be included in a FC3/4. I am sure that I
> > could be wrong about this but this is my take on it.
>
>
> the last release was in 1998. 
>
> the thing wouldnt build on any modern system and be usable without an
> assortment of patches from qmail.org.
>
> rpms with these patches wouldnt be possible since binary
> redistribution with modifications are not allowed under the qmail
> license.
>
> someone could create a good spec file if they wanted to i guess

--
Aly Dharshi
aly.dharshi@xxxxxxxxx

	 "A good speech is like a good dress
	  that's short enough to be interesting
	  and long enough to cover the subject"