Re: Logwatch replacement..

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Logwatch replacement..
• From: David Cary Hart <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:40:30 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 14:33 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Anyone here that can recommend a replacement for Logwatch that allows
> more fine grained user control over what gets reported?

The simplest solution MIGHT be to cron egrep <whatever you want> logfile
|mail <to you>

You might also want to take a look at swatch which is on sourceforge.

________________________________________________________________________
Total Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence
http://www.TQMcube.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Logwatch replacement..
    • From: Harry Putnam

• References:
  • Logwatch replacement..
    • From: Harry Putnam

• Prev by Date: Re: qmail inclusion in official release of FC4?
• Next by Date: dynamic dns, bind + dhcpd problem
• Previous by thread: Logwatch replacement..
• Next by thread: Re: Logwatch replacement..
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread