Re: Why is kernel optimized for size?

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Why is kernel optimized for size?
• From: Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@xxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:25:59 +0800
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 16:28, Paul Howarth wrote:
> The new 2.6.9-1.724 kernel scraps the 4G/4G patch.

I read on the ACPI list that it's because there was some ACPI issues
which was biting. Something to do woth Video and reboots


-- 
Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 
98% Microsoft(tm) Free!! 
Neuromancer 19:25:15 up 10:13, 8 users, 
load average: 1.97, 2.12, 2.07 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why is kernel optimized for size?
    • From: Matthew Miller

• References:
  • Why is kernel optimized for size?
    • From: Steve Snyder
  • Re: Why is kernel optimized for size?
    • From: Paul Howarth

• Prev by Date: active apps don't show up in task-bar
• Next by Date: lexmark z25 printer in FC3
• Previous by thread: Re: Why is kernel optimized for size?
• Next by thread: Re: Why is kernel optimized for size?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread