Re: Comparing Windows and Fedora Core Font Rendering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[snip]

> Having done so, I made a series of screen captures under both Windows

2000 and Fedora Core 2 (fully updated), on my dual-booting Inspiron
5000e laptop. Here are the results:

http://cradle.brokenglass.com/arial_test/

When comparing, please disregard the headings that wound up being
anti-aliased on Win2K but not on FC2.

As you can see, the results are not identical, and, I think, look
poorer on Fedora.

I think they both look terrible. I'm running Firefox-1.0 on FC/3, with my font setting for Proportional set to San-Serif 14pt, San-Serif set to Arial, and "Always use my fonts" checked (selected) -- it looks terrible; however, changing San-Serif to san-serif, Bitstream Vera Sans, Luxi Sans, Nimbus Sans L, or Tahoma makes www.slashdot.org look terrific!


Try losing the Arial and using a different proportional font. Note: I installed the msttcorefonts-1.3-3 RPM package.


YMMV.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux