On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 23:43 +0000, Paul Flanders wrote: > I have many RH9 servers running and need to upgrade, i have been putting > in FC1 servers as 'i feel' it seems bit safer knowing that FC1 was very > stable has lots of updates and runs well on DELL servers and after the > hassle with FC2 (ended up going back to FC1) and FC3 (can not get samba > working fully 'dont ask!') I think at the moment ill stick to RH9 and > FC1. The "legacy" 15-18 month business is a bit worrying especially if > the FC versions cycle out very quickly. I may look at RH Enterprise but > there is a cost to it. I manage over 50 RH servers and i really dont > like the idea of upgrading them all to often especially when so much > seems to break between versions. > > Paul I was in a similar situation. Whitebox Enterprise Linux did the trick for me. WBEL is RHEL 3.0, without the branding, and with excellent updating capability. http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/ Brad
