Jeff Kinz said: >> Jeff Kinz said: >> >>> On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 09:00:57AM -0600, Randy wrote: >>> >>>> set up squirrelmail to highlight all messages from the group. I > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >>>> don't suppose they'd switch to squirrelmail? :-) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > >>> Lets see, exchange my instant response time using mutt for something >>> several seconds slower, which I can't access securely from anywhere on >>> anything that doesn't have a browser/GUI screen. >> > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 01:02:09PM -0500, William Hooper wrote: > >> Get over yourself. The OP said they were using webmail. >> > > Dear Bill, Nothing to get over. Randy was (not seriously) suggesting > that all the subscribers to this list switch to squirrelmail (it appears > that you missed that part of his email) No, Randy was suggesting that the OP see if his webmail provider could switch. You were the one that assumed it had anything to do with you using webmail. > I pointed out that doing so would entail a fairly sever increase in time > to process email for those already using mutt. Which up to this point in the thread is.... no one. > Bill, please do read the full email before making irrelevant comments. I suggest you do the same. Please don't bring your anti-webmail bias into every discussion involving webmail. -- William Hooper
