On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Mercury Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:04:52 -0800, Rob <wasguru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > rpm.livna.org is what you want
> >
> > as long as you dont want x86_64
>
> Yeah, what is the deal with livna?
>
> Do livna folks think that by dropping x86_64 support
> we'll all turn in our AMD64 machines for 32-bit machines?
>
> If I was gonna drop support for one of the two, it wouldn't
> be the 64-bit architecture, it would be the older architecture.
>
> Oh well, Dag is still in business. And you can always have
> fun compiling from source. Thanks, livna. For nothing.
Why so quick to assume everyone is out to make your life miserable?
>From the rpm.livna.org home page:
Thursday, October 28: x86_64 packages support dropped
-----------------------------------------------------
Since we don't have an x86_64 maintainer anymore and the rpm.livna.org
team can't guarantee the stability of the currently available x86_64
packages, we have dropped support for the x86_64 architecture. Sorry :(
Volunteer organizations are like that. If it's important to you, maybe
you could volunteer? Fedora x86_64 users everywhere would sing your
praises.
--
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
