Am Mi, den 08.12.2004 schrieb Mike Klinke um 18:21: > > We did a paid study on the issue. The bottom line is that > > greylisting is great for reducing spam but may be HORRIBLE in a > > business environment. > After having used it for the past 6 months or so in a small business > environment and having nothing but excellent results I'm interested > in how you arrived at your conclusion. Is this a problem of scale? > > Regards, Mike Klinke Seem Red Hat now uses greylisting his own too. My last posting was deferred and I saw following in my mail server's log: Dec 10 03:55:18 noc sm-mta[34507]: iBA2t4kA034505: to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, delay=00:00:13, xdelay=00:00:12, mailer=esmtp, pri=32357, relay=mx2.redhat.com. [66.187.237.31], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: 451 4.7.1 greylisted for 21 minutes and 27 seconds. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.9-1.6_FC2smp Serendipity 04:20:55 up 4 days, 3:43, load average: 0.81, 1.43, 1.81
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
