On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 22:18 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 18:00 -0400, Ted Gervais wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 15:36 -0500, William Hooper wrote: > > > Ted Gervais said: > > > > [ve1drg@mach3 ~]$ rpm -q fedora-release > > > > fedora-release-3-8 > > > > > > Good, fedora-release was updated correctly. > > > > > > >> > > > >> What does your yum.conf have in it? > > > >> > > > > > > > > Well it is the same yum.conf file from a year or so ago. Here is the > > > > first part of it: > > > > > > Does that imply there is more you aren't showing us? > > > > No. No.. Its just that it is a long file. > > > > > > Could you give the full output of yum when you are having the issue? > > > > When the up2date screen comes up I see lines that are ticked that say: > > > > fedora-core-2 > > updates-released-fc2 > > fedora-us-stable-fc2-stable > > > > That looks like it is going after fc2 updates and not fc3 stuff? > > Maybe there aren't enough/any fc3 updates?? > > up2date doesn't use yum.conf > > Edit /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources and change the 2s to 3s. OK. Well that is different. I was changing my yum.conf file and of course that would never fix anything. Now, I wonder why that during an upgrade such as moving from fc2 to fc3, that the sources file you are speaking wasn't upgraded. I know we may have specialty site that we go to in that file but as a new base maybe a new sources file would be provided when upgrading but the older 'sources' file kept aside. Just wondering.. > > Then try up2date again. > > Paul. > -- > Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >
