On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 13:54 -0500, Scot L. Harris wrote: > On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 13:01, D. D. Brierton wrote: > > > > > Well I am running Spamassassin anyway, although I haven't upgraded to > > FC3 (and hence Spamassassin 3.0) yet (still waiting for Fedora Extras). > > I am looking forward to upgrading to Spamassassin 3.0 as quite a few > > spam messages are getting through now, even with Bayesian filtering. > > Blacklists were appealing because I was hoping I could get Postfix to > > reject some messages before they even got to Spamassassin, but as my > > Postfix isn't really working like a proper mail server and just does > > local delivery and relaying to my ISP's SMTP server I guess there isn't > > much more I can do. > > > > You can always install spamassassin 3.0 from sources if it is not > available via rpm. > > You may also want to check out the SARES web site. I googled for this and came up empty, would you mind sharing the link to those of us who are itnerested? > -------------------------------------- Mark Haney markh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Kernel: 2.6.9-1.681_FC3 GNU/Linux 13:57:33 up 43 min, 2 users, load average: 0.42, 0.77, 1.02
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
