Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 03:12:39AM -0500, A1tmblwd@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> The other problem I have is that he is providing updates for >> packages provided by Fedora Core with a dependency for a piece of >> code that FC does not require. > >Please check the facts before making such accusatory statements. > >As a vendor Red Hat ships perl packages that go into the vendors >folders. The debate about perl's path is that (versioned) site folders >should be at the top of the search path. That is not the case with the >default perl packaging, and therefore spacial handling _is_ required. > >But freely quoting from your bug report "I don't care about >explanations". Currently you are only contributing FUD. If you still >believe in conspiracy theory, then stop using ATrpms, and setup >atrpms-is-evil.org. I have no intention of starting an atrpms-is-evil.org site. You are not evil. You have good intentions, poor implementation. Enough on this subject. Time to move on. I bid you peace, Kam __________________________________________________________________ Switch to Netscape Internet Service. As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register Netscape. Just the Net You Need. New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups. Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp
