On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 06:12, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am So, den 05.12.2004 schrieb Alexander Dalloz um 22:59: > > > spamass-milter is known to not fail more often than it should. > > Ups, the "not" is wrong in that sentence. There reverse was meant :) > > spamass-milter is known to fail more often than it should. And I already was trying to determine if my english comprehension sucked. Spamass-milter works great for me. It's resource intensive though. -- Ow Mun Heng Gentoo/Linux on D600 1.4Ghz Neuromancer 14:20:33 up 5:01, 5 users, 0.71, 0.42, 0.41
