On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 11:31 +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > On Monday 06 December 2004 11:07, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > Please post no "post no HTML" messages. > > > > Really, I'm in sympathy with the desire not to have to read HTML. > > Fact is, they're difficult to read with kmail's default settings. At one time > I had a per script that stripped HTML out of web pages and discovered I > achieved a 90% reduction in file sized. > > I really do not want people infringing on my good nature (such as it is) by > stealing my bandwidth. I'm on dialup, and _I_ pay the bill, and _I_ get to > wait while email clears my line. > > If someone wants to pay for a wireless link or bidirectional sat _and_ pay me > for my time, then I will grin and bear it. Please respect other list users' requests not to have *their* bandwidth consumed by your "Please post no HTML" messages, and restrict such replies to private responses rather than replies to the list. Paul. -- Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
