On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 19:28 -0500, Peter Arremann wrote: > Thanks, > > so is not just me... The question is, is this a OO or a fedora problem? > I remember reading somewhere that the openoffice.org version of OO uses ispell > while the OO version from Fedora has been modified to use aspell. Is that > correct? Just wanting to make sure that I report the bug at the right > place... > > Thanks, > > Peter. > > On Sunday 05 December 2004 19:04, Satish Balay wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Peter Arremann wrote: > > > Can you do me a favor? Exit OO, restart it, then open a new document. > > > Look at the memory usage. Then go type a random mispelled word and right > > > click on it. Once the dialog has popped open, check the memory usage > > > again... > > > > Just reporting the 'used' memory (-buffers/cache) reported by 'free' > > > > Before OO starts : 155812 > > After starting OO with a foo.doc : 188388 > > % ps -eo"comm,vsize,rss" | grep soff > > soffice.bin 192372 66100 > > > > After 'type a random mispelled word and right click' (I had to trying a > > few times at which point CPU usage was 100% for a few sec) : 615164 > > % ps -eo"comm,vsize,rss" | grep soff > > soffice.bin 619132 493692 > > > > After stopping OO : 162528 > > > > - Ok - looks like OO is hogging memory. Perhaps a bug in OO? > > > > Satish > Hi All; Just watching this thread, and wanted to point you at this bug in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=138993 Not sure if this is the same thing as you are experiencing... -P