Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
• From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:04:15 +0000
• In-reply-to: <47040.193.52.125.40.1101808888.squirrel@webmail.sciences.univ-nantes.fr>
• References: <47040.193.52.125.40.1101808888.squirrel@webmail.sciences.univ-nantes.fr>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041020

Didn't you have at-stable restricted to just a couple of packages?

Paul.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
    • From: eric tanguy

• References:
  • RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
    • From: eric tanguy

• Prev by Date: Re: FC3 and network printer
• Next by Date: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
• Previous by thread: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
• Next by thread: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread