Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:04:15 +0000
In-reply-to: <47040.193.52.125.40.1101808888.squirrel@webmail.sciences.univ-nantes.fr>
References: <47040.193.52.125.40.1101808888.squirrel@webmail.sciences.univ-nantes.fr>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041020

eric tanguy wrote:

What's the difference between these 2 repo ?


Didn't you have at-stable restricted to just a couple of packages?

Paul.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
  - From: eric tanguy