Re: 3C509B and Upgrade to FC3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 3C509B and Upgrade to FC3
From: John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:12:38 +0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.7

On Tuesday 30 November 2004 01:16, fredex wrote:
> RH doesn't seem to distribute the binary driver

RH doesn't distribute binary-only drivers.

-- 
Cheers
John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3C509B and Upgrade to FC3
  - From: fredex

References:
- 3C509B and Upgrade to FC3
  - From: Gordon R. Keehn
- Re: 3C509B and Upgrade to FC3
  - From: fredex

Prev by Date: Re: Separate Mail Boxes for Different Accounts in Evolution
Next by Date: Does FC3 fix the earlier SMP lock / hang problems?
Previous by thread: Re: 3C509B and Upgrade to FC3
Next by thread: Re: 3C509B and Upgrade to FC3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux