On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Axel Thimm wrote: > Or let me rephrase the problem, why do some people insist that > replacing packages is bad? The replacements are obviously done for > some reason, and not for reducing stability and security. It's not necessarily bad, but I can understand that people wish to avoid them. It's about offering choice the same way as you'd say to exclude some package from some repository for whatever reason is acceptable for yourself. > To answer the question myself, the reasons there is a propaganda > against repos offering vendor replacements can be found in the > intentions of the people loudly proclaiming it's so dangerous to do > so. It is just an arbitrary distinction mark from the repo they > favour ... Though it shouldn't hold us back to offer that choice anyway, if it can be done by one of the tools. PS In case you have a RHEL subscription, the need for such a feature is even higher. -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
