Re: FC3: does Apache-2.0.52 have LFS (large file support) built-in?

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: FC3: does Apache-2.0.52 have LFS (large file support) built-in?
• From: Patrick <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 21:04:57 +0100
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 20:25 +0100, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
[snip]
> Your guess is right: current Apache2 lacks LFS support. Please see
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fedora-test-list&m=108304809938306&w=2
> 
> Alexander

Thanks for your reply Alexander. Although not really the kind of answer
I was looking for :)  Seems for now publishing large iso images in an
easy way is out of the question.

Cheers,
Patrick

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: FC3: does Apache-2.0.52 have LFS (large file support) built-in?
    • From: Nifty Hat Mitch
  • Re: FC3: does Apache-2.0.52 have LFS (large file support) built-in?
    • From: John Summerfield

• References:
  • FC3: does Apache-2.0.52 have LFS (large file support) built-in?
    • From: Patrick
  • Re: FC3: does Apache-2.0.52 have LFS (large file support) built-in?
    • From: Alexander Dalloz

• Prev by Date: Re: /var versus /srv: will this ever be cleaned up?
• Next by Date: Re: Problem connecting to fedora.us core repository
• Previous by thread: Re: FC3: does Apache-2.0.52 have LFS (large file support) built-in?
• Next by thread: Re: FC3: does Apache-2.0.52 have LFS (large file support) built-in?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread