Hi > lose across upgrades. ideally, this is the kind of stuff that /srv > was designed for, no? exactly. > > and FC3 automatically installs /srv (yay!), and then does absolutely > nothing with it (boo!). all of the network services info is still > under /var, as always. well fc3 release notes clearly mention that they have been only added for FHS compatibility and fedora doesnt actually use them yet. whether they will do so eventually is a question that should be asked in the devel list > > what are people doing in terms of starting to officially use the > /srv directory? symlinks? such as > > /var/www -> /srv/www > /var/yp -> /srv/yp > > etc, etc. i realize the FHS is still completely vague on how /srv is > going to be used. i'm just curious about what some folks are doing > with it, if anything. > I believe the /srv directly is defined as one storing site specific data so the symlinks above should comply with until fedora gets around to moving stuff over there by default if ever -- Regards, Rahul Sundaram
