Yes, learning to work with the udev is the answer. The PC-PalmIIIex link works after every PC reboot (just for experimenting). Thanks. Hans Ottens On Wed, 2004-24-11 at 19:33 -0500, fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Where are we going in the Fedora development? > (John Summerfield) > 2. Re: FC2 and RPM (Rahul Sundaram) > 3. Re: sshd: it is permit to login with a Empty Password > (William Hooper) > 4. Re: FC3, minimun install and XForwarding (Fernando Gozalo) > 5. Re: kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where > kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works (John Summerfield) > 6. Re: FC3 Seems to "Freeze" sometimes (John Summerfield) > 7. Re: How to block a range of IP's with > system-config-securitylevel-tui? (John Summerfield) > 8. Re: Serial terminal emulator (fredex) > 9. Re: FC3 Seems to "Freeze" sometimes (Colin O'Flynn) > 10. Re: kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where > kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works (William Hooper) > 11. Anybody got FC3 installed on software raid-1 with Grub > (Yusuf Goolamabbas) > 12. Re: Can't get shockwave viewer to install in FC3 (Kim Lux) > 13. Re: BOOBY TRAPS? (Rodolfo J. Paiz) > 14. Re: Palm Pilot and FC3 - Again! (Thomas Zehetbauer) > 15. Re: Server Tools Don't Prompt for Root Password (Randy Chrismon) > 16. Re: BOOBY TRAPS? (Arthur Stephens) > 17. Re: kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where > kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works (Rahul Sundaram) > 18. Re: BOOBY TRAPS? (Rahul Sundaram) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:14:54 +0800 > From: John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Where are we going in the Fedora development? > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <200411250714.55050.debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Thursday 25 November 2004 00:07, akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Once again I want to share something but don't want to start a rant. > > > > I finally got FC3 installed and have serious questions as to where > > this Fedora Development is going. Are changes being made for good > > reason or just to be different? Is there good reason to have two > > panels on the screen (at top and bottom) instead of one, two > > That's Gnome 2.8. Compare with Ubuntu, a Debian-based distro. It's a single-CD > install (but essentiall all of Debian downloadable after installation). > > It also does some things better than FC does. > > > essentially equivalent menus under different icons, logout hidden in a > > different place, etc. > > My reaction to having changes made in resolv.conf disappear after a > > reboot was not a positive one. Luckily I had a hint of why this was > > happening in a previous posting. > > dhcp has done that for ever. pppd has too, but that's configurable. > > > > > > I could go on with changes like udev and /media in place of /mnt but > /media is LSB compliance. Debian does it too. Previously RH and Debian > differed. > > > you get the idea. Are these changes caused by a overwhelming goal that > > trumps the confusion they cause. > > > > In the back of my mind I would like Windows users to switch to Linux seeing > > it can be presented in as friendly appearance as Windows is to them. > > Windows changes too. Get new Windows, likely you'll need new apps. Sometimes, > get new Windows SP & need new apps. > > > > -- > Cheers > John > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 04:44:01 +0530 > From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: FC2 and RPM > To: dave.woolcock@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <c79487d6041124151476cb893e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:50:01 +0000, dave.woolcock@xxxxxxxxxxx > <dave.woolcock@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:51:47 -0600 (CST), you wrote: > > > > >Oh you mean - install some RPM built for SUSE 8.0 on FC3? > > > > er, yes - I thought you could do that. > > > > Otherwise Linux is worse than Windoze DLL hell > > not really. its just that they are likely to be incompatible which has > nothing to do with shared libraries > > > -- > Regards, > Rahul Sundaram > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:29:23 -0500 (EST) > From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: sshd: it is permit to login with a Empty Password > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <1444.192.168.0.254.1101338963.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > > Dario Lesca said: > > On a standard installation of FC1 and FC2 (and FC3?) is permit to login > > with a user with a empty password ... is this correct? > > No, it doesn't. > > > [root@igloo root]# man sshd_config > > > >> PermitEmptyPasswords > >> When password authentication is allowed, it specifies whether the > >> server allows login to accounts with empty password strings. The default > >> is no. > > The default is to not allow empty password strings. > > > [root@igloo root]# grep PermitEmptyPasswords /etc/ssh/sshd_config > > #PermitEmptyPasswords no > > If, for what ever reason I can't conceive, you would want to allow people > to log in via ssh without a password, uncomment this line and change it to > "yes". First, though, make sure your machine is sufficiently isolated > from any insecure network (like the Internet). > > -- > William Hooper > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:32:28 +0100 (CET) > From: "Fernando Gozalo" <fgozalo0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: FC3, minimun install and XForwarding > To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <12959.80.58.4.107.1101339148.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Fernando Gozalo wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have done a FC3 minimun install in a server. I have tried to ssh to > >> the > >> server with XForwarding but with no success. > >> > >> I've tried several things: > >> . from a FC2 to this FC3 with "ssh -X server" > >> . from a FC3 to this FC3 with "ssh -X server" and "ssh -Y server" > >> > >> No XForwarding :( > >> > >> So, I think I need to install other package/packages, but don't know. > >> > >> Any hint? > > > > You'll need atleast 'xauth' to have ssh-x11-forwarding working. Try: > > > > yum install xorg-x11-xauth > > > > Satish > > > > It works. > > Gracias. > Fernando. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:51:26 +0800 > From: John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where > kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <200411250651.26683.debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Wednesday 24 November 2004 23:01, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > > This doesn't solve the original problems of labels not working. But > > IMHO, labels were bad idea to begin with, so I can't say I feel sorry > > for seeing them not working ;-) > > Labels are a good idea implemented poorly. The kernel should whinge loutly > when it sees duplicates. > > My background is in IBM mainframes. Even as far back as OS (aka OS/360) > storage volumes (disk ^ such and tape) were labelled. OS complained whenever > it saw two volumes with the same "volume serial number." > > Back then, disk volumes held no more than one filesystem. > > There was never any confustion about duplicates because they were always > announced at the time. During IPL the operator had to choose one; once the > system was up the newer one was unmounted. > > > > > -- > Cheers > John > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:30:33 +0800 > From: John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: FC3 Seems to "Freeze" sometimes > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <200411250630.33726.debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Wednesday 24 November 2004 22:07, P Jones wrote: > > In FC2 a problem that sounds like the problem you're having was traced > > to Klipper, > > That sounds entirely consistent with my observations. > > > -- > Cheers > John > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:28:12 +0800 > From: John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: How to block a range of IP's with > system-config-securitylevel-tui? > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <200411250628.12971.debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Wednesday 24 November 2004 21:51, Vinicius wrote: > > I get this URL about shorewall > > "http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_setup_guide.htm";. I will read it soon. > > > > Can it be integrated with FC3's netfilter/iptables? > > This and many more questions will be ansered as you read that document. > > > > > Could you show us a simple configuration about the "cans" and > > "cannots", please? > > Once you understand the topic it's quite simple but there are several files > involved. > > One normally defines z series of zones, and mostly each zone is on a its own > interface. > > In this particular case, there was only one interface but I wanted different > access rules for each of three groups of addresses. > > > It seems in any event I can't send any of the config to the list; the box > seems to be down atm. > > > > -- > Cheers > John > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:41:38 -0500 > From: fredex <fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Serial terminal emulator > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20041124234138.GA11651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:07:56PM +0100, Jakub Roguski wrote: > > Hi all, > > I very often have to configure devices, which use serial port and null-modem > > cable for communication. I'm looking for the most comfortable solution of > > VT100 terminal emulator running over serial port on FC3. I tried minicom, but > > would like something easier to use. Any idea? Maybe a way to use linux > > terminal together with serial port? Or simple VT100 emulator using serial? > > I seemto recall having found that PUTTY has a linux version. But whether > that is true or not, the linux console is more or less a superset of > vt100 (as long as you don't want the keys to work like vt100 keys), > and the xterm also works reasonably in lieu of vt100. > > Fred > > -- > ---- Fred Smith -- fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----------------------------- > The Lord detests the way of the wicked > but he loves those who pursue righteousness. > ----------------------------- Proverbs 15:9 (niv) ----------------------------- > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20041124/39fd595f/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:45:12 -0400 > From: "Colin O'Flynn" <coflynn@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: FC3 Seems to "Freeze" sometimes > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <200411241945.12449.coflynn@xxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Okay - I want to try disabling the acrobat plugin in Firefox. However I can't > seem to do that... > > I don't know what I've done wrong, I can't find any reference to acrobat or a > file with a name pdf in it as I am supposed to in the /usr/lib/firefox-1.0/ > directory. Nor can I find mention of it in any of the preference files to the > best of my knowledge... > > Anyone got some hints? I don't fully remember how I installed Acrobat - it was > with the provided script I think. > > Regards, > > -Colin > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:45:59 -0500 (EST) > From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where > kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <1518.192.168.0.254.1101339959.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > > John Summerfield said: > > On Wednesday 24 November 2004 23:01, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > > > >> This doesn't solve the original problems of labels not working. But > >> IMHO, labels were bad idea to begin with, so I can't say I feel sorry > >> for seeing them not working ;-) > > > > Labels are a good idea implemented poorly. The kernel should whinge > > loutly when it sees duplicates. > > IIUC the kernel knows nothing of labels. They are a purely a userland > concept (which is why you must use an initrd if you wish to use them). > > -- > William Hooper > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:49:16 +0800 > From: Yusuf Goolamabbas <yusufg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Anybody got FC3 installed on software raid-1 with Grub > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <20041124234916.GA11958@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi, There seems to be a number of bugs relating to Grub not installing > well on software raid-1 config. The symptoms seem to be that after a > install, the system just hangs on boot > > http://tinyurl.com/6t2vz > > expands to a bugzilla query of 'grub raid'. > If someone has successfully installed FC3 on a software raid-1 system > (without LVM) then I would appreciate info regarding their hardware > config and steps they took (if they were different from standard > install) > > There is a workaround of updating the MBR in rescue mode but that > doesn't work in all cases > > http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=26912 > > Regards, Yusuf > -- > Yusuf Goolamabbas > yusufg@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:03:00 -0700 > From: Kim Lux <lux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Can't get shockwave viewer to install in FC3 > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <1101340980.3719.12.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > > Thanks for the link to the flashviewer rpm. > > It installed fine, ie without errors on my FC3, but doesn't install > flash for konqueror. Firefox used flash fine. > > rpm returns this (plus messages about NOID !) > > Registering flashplayer as a XPCOM component in > /usr/lib/mozilla-1.7.3 > > Registering flashplayer as a XPCOM component in > /usr/lib/firefox-1.0 > Setup is complete. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 15:56 -0700, Kim Lux wrote: > > Not only did it not take the install path properly, but it started some > > sort of rogue process on my machine ! My laptop fan went nuts and I did > > a top and found a macromedia process running ! What is up with that ? > > > > I very much dislike installing third party closed source software that > > comes from the Internet. I killed the macromedia process. A few > > minutes later my fan went nuts again. This time top showed the process > > "top" running at 98% cpu usage. I rebooted and now the process list > > looks OK. > > > > I need shockwave to view a website. Anyone else had this > > experience ? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 15:43 -0700, Kim Lux wrote: > > > > > > #./flashplayer-installer > > > > > > Copyright(C) 2002-2003 Macromedia, Inc. All rights reserved. > > > > > > Macromedia Flash Player 7 for Linux > > > > > > Macromedia Flash Player 7 will be installed on this machine. > > > > > > You are running the Macromedia Flash Player installer as the "root" > > > user. > > > Macromedia Flash Player 7 will be installed system-wide. > > > > > > Support is available at http://www.macromedia.com/support/flashplayer/ > > > > > > To install Macromedia Flash Player 7 now, press ENTER. > > > > > > To cancel the installation at any time, press Control-C. > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTE: Macromedia Flash Player requires two font packages > > > to be installed, ttfonts and urw-fonts. > > > > > > Press ENTER to continue... > > > > > > > > > NOTE: Please exit any browsers you may have running. > > > > > > Press ENTER to continue... > > > > > > Please enter the installation path of the Mozilla, Netscape, > > > or Opera browser (i.e., /usr/lib/mozilla): /usr/lib > > > > > > WARNING: Please enter a valid installation path. > > > > > > Please enter the installation path of the Mozilla, Netscape, > > > or Opera browser (i.e., /usr/lib/mozilla): /usr/lib/mozilla > > > > > > WARNING: Please enter a valid installation path. > > > > > > Please enter the installation path of the Mozilla, Netscape, > > > or Opera browser (i.e., /usr/lib/mozilla): /usr/bin > > > > > > WARNING: Please enter a valid installation path. > > > > > > Please enter the installation path of the Mozilla, Netscape, > > > or Opera browser (i.e., /usr/lib/mozilla): > > > > > > > > > # find / -name konqueror > > > /usr/bin/konqueror > > > /usr/share/apps/konqueror > > > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konqueror > > > /home/krlux/.kde/share/apps/konqueror > > > /home/sheri/.kde/share/apps/konqueror > > > /root/.kde/share/apps/konqueror > > > > > > # find / -name mozilla > > > /usr/lib/mozilla > > > /usr/bin/mozilla > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Kim Lux (Mr.) Diesel Research Inc > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:13:56 -0600 > From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: BOOBY TRAPS? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1101341636.3668.59.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 14:57 -0800, Arthur Stephens wrote: > > Doing a server new install yesterday. > > Came in this morning and there was this message on the console of my > > fedora3 box > > > > BOOBY TRAPS > > INIT: version 2.85 reloading > > > > You may safely disregard the "INIT" line. It comes up now and again but > is entirely harmless. The "booby traps" line I have never seen, but it > sure as hell does not sound good. > > Is this box connected to a network or the Internet? Is it firewalled? > Did you check the logs? Is it even remotely possible that it has been > cracked? > > Cheers, > > -- > Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 01:15:14 +0100 > From: Thomas Zehetbauer <thomasz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Palm Pilot and FC3 - Again! > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <1101341714.4260.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Manual symlinks in /dev do not work with udev, add the following line > to /etc/udev/rules.d/10-local.rules: > KERNEL="ttyUSB1",SYMLINK="pilot" > > Permissions on /dev/pilot are given to every user logging on locally, > this is specified in /etc/security/console.perms and processed upon > login and when udev creates entries device entries. > > Tom > > -- > T h o m a s Z e h e t b a u e r ( TZ251 ) > PGP encrypted mail preferred - KeyID 96FFCB89 > finger thomasz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx for key > > Attempting to apply the OSI layers model to a real network is just like > attempting to represent seven dimensions in four dimensional reality. > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 481 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part > Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20041125/4f1233ac/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:20:06 -0500 > From: Randy Chrismon <rchrismon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Server Tools Don't Prompt for Root Password > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <41A52536.4090000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Matthew Miller wrote: > > >On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 08:54:45PM -0500, Randy Chrismon wrote: > > > > > >> <snip> > > > > > >>From the 'rpm' man page -- the "M" means the 'mode' (a.k.a. file > >permissions) have changed. And, as the first error message above indicates, > >this binary needs to be setuid root -- that is, owned by root and have the > >setuid file permission. > > > > > >Have you run any scripts to "secure" your system? An overzealous [1] > >security sweep could very easily choose to remove that bit.... > > > > > >(The "G" is also a little bit disturbing -- it means the group ownership has > >changed, and on my system, it's in group "root". Odd for that to change.) > > > > > > > > > > > Mea culpa! Mea maxima culpa! > Two lessons: 1. I don't know what I'm doing, generally, and particularly > with file permissions and user rights. 2. Don't do things when you don't > know what you're doing. > A few days before I noticed the problem, I did a chown on one of the > /usr subdirectories (I don't even remember which one, now) so I could > execute an executable of some sort. That's probably where things got > messed up. Don't ask me what I was thinking because I probably wasn't. > > Anyway, I've changed the user:group back to root:root. Now, I don't even > get the insufficient privileges message box. Whatever system setting app > now just refuses to start. OTOH, now I know what I did wrong, where I > did it, and what man pages to look at. Thanks for all the help; I > wouldn't have made it this far, otherwise. > Randy > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:30:30 -0800 > From: "Arthur Stephens" <astephens@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: BOOBY TRAPS? > To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <0e2c01c4d285$f7eacca0$c600a8c0@tyliteworker> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Brand new install on 11/22/04. Connected on our local 192.168.0.x network > on 11/23/04 > It was firewalled before being connected. > Could not find anything unusual in the logs. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 4:13 PM > Subject: Re: BOOBY TRAPS? > > > > On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 14:57 -0800, Arthur Stephens wrote: > > > Doing a server new install yesterday. > > > Came in this morning and there was this message on the console of my > > > fedora3 box > > > > > > BOOBY TRAPS > > > INIT: version 2.85 reloading > > > > > > > You may safely disregard the "INIT" line. It comes up now and again but > > is entirely harmless. The "booby traps" line I have never seen, but it > > sure as hell does not sound good. > > > > Is this box connected to a network or the Internet? Is it firewalled? > > Did you check the logs? Is it even remotely possible that it has been > > cracked? > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:01:05 +0530 > From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where > kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <c79487d604112416312724e441@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:51:26 +0800, John Summerfield > <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wednesday 24 November 2004 23:01, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > > > This doesn't solve the original problems of labels not working. But > > > IMHO, labels were bad idea to begin with, so I can't say I feel sorry > > > for seeing them not working ;-) > > > > Labels are a good idea implemented poorly. The kernel should whinge loutly > > when it sees duplicates. > > officially devlabel is depreciated in favor of udev. so i guess your > problem should go away soon > > -- > Regards, > Rahul Sundaram > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 18 > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:02:37 +0530 > From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: BOOBY TRAPS? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <c79487d60411241632714f97bb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:57:30 -0800, Arthur Stephens <astephens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Doing a server new install yesterday. > > Came in this morning and there was this message on the console of my > > fedora3 box > > > > BOOBY TRAPS > > INIT: version 2.85 reloading > > > > > suggestion: download the kernel source code and grep it. If this line > is not in the kernel your machine is probably cracked > > download chkroot and rkhunter and make sure its not trojaned > >
