Re: yum vs. apt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Matthew Miller wrote:

On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:22:05AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
and apt does not
handle multi-arch (i386 vs x86_64, PPC, ...).
In its native environment it does this just fine. Debian boasts 13 or so
architechtures and such a limitation would be intolerable

I think you're misunderstanding. It's not a question of whether it can handle different architectures at all (it certainly can) but whether it can properly handle the mix-n-match thing that x86_64 Fedora Core uses. I believe Debian has opted to avoid the problem entirely by sticking to pure 64bit apps on x86_64.

Indeed. Apt runs on x86_64 (and several other archs) and can handle mixing x86_64 and i386 packages just fine, *as long as the package names differ*.
Which in practise means that FC and RHEL on biarch systems dont work with apt, at least Suse handles this situation differently.


	- Panu -


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux