Re: Adaptec SCSI RAID Problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have both the onboard SCSI controllers and add on Adaptec 39420D-R cards, on Tyan dual Athlon MP motherboards, configured under FC2 and FC3 without any problems.

I ran into a similar thing where RH9 worked using the raidtab file and wouldn't work under FC2 & 3. I use software raid and found I needed to set the 'Linux raid detect' flag on the hard drive partitions, then configure mdadm.conf with the uuid string. Now all the raid boxes work. I even learned how to move a raid box from one machine to another and modify the superblocks to change the /dev/md? setting so I could run two RAID boxes from one server.

Bill

PS: Of course if I could have used SuSE-9.1 instead I would not have had the problems I ran into in attempting to use Fedora. (already had two of my raid boxes running on a single server with SuSE-9.1 as an experiment)  Unfortunately where I work there is a "Redhat only" rule.


>> Just tring to install C3 on a server. Having
>> challanges getting it to 
>> recognise the SCSI RAID5 Array.
>> 
>> It is a Tyan S2518UGN motherboard with Dual PIII´s
>> 1.4GHz and 3.5Gb of 
>> Ram with 3 x 36Gb SCSI HDD´s and 2 x 40Gb ide HDD´s.
>> 
>> It is running an Adaptec AIC-7899W SCSI Controler
>> onboard with a 
>> Zero-Channel RAID 2000S Controler Card installed
>> controling the raid.
 
>> I have created the raid array in the Raid controler
>> so that is all 
>> working correctly and I have tested the server and
>> it can see the RAID 
>> array using RH E3.0 or RH9 but using Fedora C3 it
>> only sees the IDE HDD´s.
>> 
>> Does anyone have any ideas as to why? and how to
>> solve the problem so 
>> that I can get Fedora to run and play on this
>> equipment.

> I tried installing FC on my new system, which has a
> similiar config.

> After much wrangling, I kept the system at RH9,
> because I fould out that Adaptec did not port their
> drivers to the latest releases of the kernel (2.6+).

> After finding that out, I learned that the 2.4 kernels
> worked, which is what RH9 and the Enterprise line
> uses.

> eric

> PS  If that has changed, then there is a great reason
> for me to upgrade.   :) 

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux