Am Do, den 18.11.2004 schrieb Daniel B. Thurman um 1:16: > I was told from another user that apache 2.0.51 has > a serious bug and need to switch immeadiately to > 2.0.52. I was not told if my senario of backspacing > was the related bug or not. Anyone know?? Which *exakt* version do you run? -> rpm -q httpd The bug you probably address is CAN-2004-0811. See http://www.apacheweek.com/features/security-20. This was already fixed with the Fedora security release 2.0.51-2.6. $ rpm -qp --changelog httpd-2.0.51-2.9.i386.rpm | head -13 * Do Nov 11 2004 Joe Orton <jorton@xxxxxxxxxx> 2.0.51-2.9 - add fix for memory consumption DoS, CAN-2004-0942 - mod_ssl: add fix for SSLCipherSuite bypass, CAN-2004-0885 * Mi Sep 22 2004 Joe Orton <jorton@xxxxxxxxxx> 2.0.51-2.7 - ap_rgetline_core fix from Rici Lake * Mi Sep 22 2004 Joe Orton <jorton@xxxxxxxxxx> 2.0.51-2.6 - fix 2.0.51 regression in Satisfy merging (CAN-2004-0811) Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp Serendipity 03:07:24 up 4:53, 16 users, 0.29, 0.44, 0.44
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
