On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 02:04 -0500, Ghod wrote: > I'm planning to upgrade a RH9 machine to either FC2 or FC3 > any opinions? which should I do? is FC3 stable enough? > all input welcome (no flaming!) FC3 seems pretty stable and fixes for problems are showing up fast. OTOH, it's still a bit of a bumpy ride and if this is a production machine FC2 still seems a safer bet. You've got to decide how important stability is to you versus the latest bells/whistles/features. > Also which way would you recommend to do the upgrade? > should I just DL the CD images and burn them? what? > which is easiest? Depends again. For a single machine, just downloading images/boot.iso and doing an install over the network will probably take less time and bandwidth than dealing with the CD or DVD iso[s]. For a few machines, or if you just like to have the media in hand, DL & burn the isos. For a bunch, make a local mirror and install over the LAN. If you go for the isos, I highly recommend bittorrent. http://torrent.dulug.duke.edu/ My $0.02, Phil
