Re: MSA & MTA & Milters Was [Re: Firewall and NAT]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 18:53, Paul Howarth wrote:
Is this what you want (the milters)? I'm still composing a reply to another email about having separate milters on the MSA and MTA.

On outgoing emails? No. I want them to bypass the MTA and go straight to the MX.

Right, so you want to use one of the solutions I outlined in the `Sendmail Milter Question' thread. I think having two instances running is rather wasteful so I'd suggest upgrading to 8.13.x or at least rebuilding 8.12.x with -D_FFR_MILTER_PERDAEMON if you're running sendmail 8.12.x. It's much simpler that way.


Hmm.. this may prove to be futile since in the company, with no I-net
access, emails gets set out via the FALLBACK_MX (whcih is actually the
SMART_HOST equilvalent, only better)

That should still work with the MSA.

But hang on, sending local emails to local users still go through the
milters. Which I Don't want.


Objective. All outgoing emails from Evo, gets sent to port 587, and then
goes to the recipient.

Understood.

Paul.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux