On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 11:49, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 28 October 2004 11:42, Bill Gradwohl wrote: > >http://www.fokus.fhg.de/research/cc/glone/employees/joerg.schilling/ > >private/cdrecord.html > > > >The above site emphatically states that Redhat provides a version of > >cdrtools not to the liking of the developer. > >Why did Redhat/Fedora make changes to Mr Schilling's product? > > > >If I were to follow the developers advice and compile from source, > > what would I be hurting? > >Anyone running virgin cdrtools code on their FC2? > > Yup, lots of us are I suspect. And k3b works errorless for what I do. So if I use cdrecord from them I wouldn't get that message "It's not us so don't call us"? Tim...
