Am Di, den 26.10.2004 schrieb Bryan O'Sullivan um 7:08: > It is, but when you run dovecot in compatibility mode (on mbox format > folders), you gain very little performance benefit over UW-imapd. That is not true. Hard drives love prefetching and mbox is fast if you have an index. And dovecot does indexing. > Cyrus is a pain in the neck to administer, but it has some features > (mainly virtual users) that were not available in dovecot until > recently, and it probably still has some features that dovecot doesn't. > That said, it has very little active development or support, and > terrible documentation; I migrated from Cyrus to dovecot six months ago, > and wouldn't go back. Well, Cyrus-IMAPd is feature rich and powerful. From that it is clear that it is not that easy to setup and administer. But running a mailer server (MTA and IMP/POP3) is very complex at all. And it is wrong that the Cyrus-IMAPd is little developed. I don't know from what you conclude that. And there is support by authors and user community. There is a good wiki and a mailinglist. > <b Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp Serendipity 16:45:43 up 6 days, 13:25, load average: 0.01, 0.16, 0.17
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
