On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 02:45:02PM -0600, Ken Johanson wrote: > I meant to say that its desirable to get the incremental updates using > any lightweight (or not) methods, say CVS, without downloading a whole > new rpm (source tree) for each update - or even becoming dependent on rpm... This is a branch into a different argument -- if you don't want to use RPM, why do you want a binary RPM of the kernel source? But really, I think you _do_ want to use RPM, and just don't know it yet. :) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
