Am Fr, den 15.10.2004 schrieb François Patte um 19:46: > > > * Application version scan > > > - GnuPG 1.2.3 [ Vulnerable > > ] > > > - Apache 2.0.47 [ Vulnerable > > ] > > > - OpenSSL 0.9.7a [ Vulnerable > > ] > > > - PHP 4.3.3 [ Vulnerable > > ] > > > - OpenSSH 3.6.1p2 [ Vulnerable > > ] > http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/fedoralegacy/legacy/fedora/1/updates/i386/gnupg-1.2.3-2.i386.rpm > > > http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/fedoralegacy/legacy/fedora/1/updates/i386/httpd-2.0.51-1.4.legacy.i386.rpm > > > http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/fedoralegacy/legacy/fedora/1/updates/i386/openssl-0.9.7a-33.10.i386.rpm > > > http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/fedoralegacy/legacy/fedora/1/updates/i386/php-4.3.8-1.1.i386.rpm > Something is wrong in rkhunter: > > rpm -q gnupg > gnupg-1.2.3-2 > > rpm -q httpd > le paquetage httpd n'est pas installé > > rpm -q openssl > openssl-0.9.7a-33.10 > > rpm -q php > le paquetage php n'est pas installé > > rpm -q openssh > openssh-3.6.1p2-19 > François Patte Yes, that is indeed curious. You really checked the same system? How should rkhunter detect the initial Apache2 version of FC1 http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/fedoralegacy/legacy/fedora/1/os/i386/httpd-2.0.47-10.i386.rpm if this package isn't even installed. Along with the the detected PHP version http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/fedoralegacy/legacy/fedora/1/os/i386/php-4.3.3-6.i386.rpm Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp Serendipity 19:58:22 up 1 day, 15:09, load average: 0.02, 0.19, 0.16
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
