K3B worked fine with data. But the OSS mixer and Alsa mixer don't seem to work right, I check the rec box and sometimes it is there when I reopen it other times not. In Gnome all the sounds work fine and I can play CD's. But I can't burn an audio CD, them machine freaks out. Is there a way I can use yum to reinstall the two with all that depends on them? I hate to "force" them back in as I don't know what I'll break in the process. Any ideas? Tim... On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 06:08, Timothy Payne wrote: > I've tried K3B and it start to record than hangs the machine. > > I've tried xcdroast it started to record then: > Starting new track at sector: 0 > cdrecord: Success. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: no error > CDB: 2A 00 00 00 09 CF 00 00 1B 00 > status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) > Sense Bytes: 70 00 05 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 64 00 00 00 > Sense Key: 0x5 Illegal Request, Segment 0 > Sense Code: 0x64 Qual 0x00 (illegal mode for this track) Fru 0x0 > Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) > resid: 63504 > cmd finished after 0.001s timeout 40s > cdrecord: A write error occured. > cdrecord: Please properly read the error message above. > > > cdrecord -scanbus: > [timothy@localhost timothy]$ cdrecord -scanbus > Cdrecord-Clone 2.01-dvd (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg > Schilling > Note: This version is an unofficial (modified) version with DVD support > Note: and therefore may have bugs that are not present in the original. > Note: Please send bug reports or support requests to > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla > Note: The author of cdrecord should not be bothered with problems in > this version. > scsidev: 'ATA' > devname: 'ATA' > scsibus: -2 target: -2 lun: -2 > Linux sg driver version: 3.5.27 > Using libscg version 'schily-0.8'. > cdrecord: Warning: using inofficial libscg transport code version > (schily - Red Hat-scsi-linux-sg.c-1.83-RH '@(#)scsi-linux-sg.c > 1.83 04/05/20 Copyright 1997 J. Schilling'). > scsibus1: > 1,0,0 100) 'MITSUMI ' 'CR-4804TE ' '2.4C' Removable > CD-ROM > 1,1,0 101) * > 1,2,0 102) * > 1,3,0 103) * > 1,4,0 104) * > 1,5,0 105) * > 1,6,0 106) * > 1,7,0 107) * > > I see a difference scsibus and scsibus1 shouldn't they be the same? Or > just one? > > Feel free to snip off the above in any reply. > > Thank you, in advance. > > Tim...
