On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:34:50 -0300, Trevor Smith <trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On September 26, 2004 5:42 pm, Joey Kelley wrote: > > I have been reading many of these threads over the past couple days, > > and there seem to be a fair amount of issues with FC2. Currently, I am > > running FC1 on a dedicated machine (Pentium II, not sure of the clock speed > > but its under 500 mhz, with 96 MB of ram and a 6 GB hard drive) and I am > > thinking of upgrading it to FC2. (the ISOs are downloading right now) The > > Frankly, I fear you may not be happy. I had been using FC1 on a PIII 500 with > 386 meg, bought a brand new laptop, must faster processor, faster HD, more > ram, and put FC1 on it and I was PLEASED with the improvement. Then I > upgraded to FC2 and EVERYTHING slowed down. Seriously. You have been warned. OTOH I'm running an older laptop using fc2 & FC3 T1/T2 (Compaq Armada M700, 320 something RAM, PIII 550) and it has been just fine. Slower than my desktop but still far more responsive than my work laptop on XP (P4 1.2 Ghz/512 RAM). I did notice a perceived (not measured) performance decrease w/ FC2 Vs. FC1 but FC3 T2 brought back a snappier 'feel'. Slick :). 'Nuf said. As always, YMMV. --- Bests, Jon ---- ><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º>¸. >>> ·´¯`·.¸. , . .·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º>> >
