On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 22:28, Sam Tregar wrote: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Pasha wrote: > > > I don't think US copyright law has anything to do with the matter. EULA > > is a sort of contract, so by agreeing to it, Roozbeh can't use fedora > > legally. > > That's only true if Iranian law recognizes the EULA, which I imagine > would have something to do with recognition of US copyright law. > Maybe the two are completely separate. I'm not an Iranian lawyer so I > can't say for certain. You are probably right - only Iranian contract law defines whether the EULA is valid in Iran. Still, I don't think recognition of US copyright law has anything to do with it. But I'm neither Iranian nor American lawyer (and neither Iranian nor American at all :) > > My point is that this question can't be answered based on the GPL or > any other contract based on US copyright law. These documents most > likely have no legal force in Iran. What's legal for Roozbeh is > defined entirely by the Iranian legal system. > > -sam >
