Re: x86_64 SAMBA yum problem (Solved)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 20:06, Peter J. Stieber wrote:
> 
> Next I attempted to determine what package required the 386
> version of SAMBA:
> 
> $ rpm -q --whatrequires samba.i386
> no package requires samba.i386
> 
> Since it wasn't required...
> 
> # rpm -e samba.i386
> # rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}.%{arch}\n' | grep samba
> samba-client-3.0.3.x86_64
> samba-swat-3.0.3.x86_64
> samba-3.0.3.x86_64
> samba-common-3.0.3.x86_64
> system-config-samba-1.2.9.noarch
> 
> Then the yum update was successful :-)
> 
> Maybe there was a time when an x86_64 version of samba wasn't
> available so the i386 version was loaded?

My guess is that it's there to support smb:// uri's for i386-only
packages like OpenOffice.org through gnome-vfs2 (which exists in both
i386 and x86_64 forms on FC2), which dlopen()'s the extension libraries
instead of linking to them -> thus no package requires it, it just
provides additional functionality if it's present.

	- Panu -



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux