Hi, On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 14:38, Andre Costa wrote: > I've been bitten by this in the past, too -- back on the (not too > distant) 2.4.x days. On my case, enabling RAM disk support for my > custom kernel allowed LABELs to be properly understood (I've been doing > it this way since then). My bet is that it would help you too. WARNING: > you might need to compile it as a built-in feature, and not as a module I must be missing something because I have enabled the RAM disk support and recompiled, but the label is still not recognized. I think I will change the label for the filesystem. I was just curious why it didn't work, even if I had the initrd in the /boot directory. Juan -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
