Chris A Czerwinski said: > On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 15:47, William Hooper wrote: > >> Phillip Compton said: >> >>> With the EOL of FC1 fast approaching, would it make sense to help >>> ease the migration to FC2 by releasing ISOs containing all the current >>> updates? >> >> Seems to me that development/testing efforts would be better focused on >> getting FC3 done than re-hashing FC2. >> > > Does that mean FC2 still needs more tweaking and adding other fixes for > it to be fully functional, so that it can stand as an ISO without any > manual intervention? No, that means any release requires a group of resources to package and test it. Seems to me that those resources are better spent on FC3. Otherwise every release will become the initial release and another release when the previous is going out of support. This effectively doubles the number of releases for no good reason. -- William Hooper
