Re: Yum slower than apt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Konosky wrote:

Jeff Allison wrote:

Rodney Gordon II wrote:

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 06:00:31PM +0900, Shawn wrote:


I did a simple
su -c"yum install perl-Date-Calc"
and to resolve dependancies my 933 cpu was at 90+% for over two and a half minutes.


what's up with that



AFAIK yum is coded in python, and APT is part c and maybe some perl?

They're just different programs, and yum lag is to be expected as it
is maturing at the moment while APT has been out for a long time.

yum has quite a bit of features that APT doesn't and vice versa..

As far as a rpm-based distro though I'd stick with yum.



Or as an alternative view use apt its mature faster and works

Jeff


Red Carpet is an awesome GUI based package manager that works a lot better than up2date, and it can use both yum and apt rpm repositories. I used yum before, and I agree it was slow, especially if you had a lot of repositories. Theres a GUI for yum called yumi, but I could never get it to work. Red Carpet also has a command line interface if you prefer doing things that way.


Only issue being that I don't think redcarpet works with FC2 if you want a gui for apt try synaptic.

Jeff



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux