Re: Test with Chkrootkit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 13:04, Norman Nunn wrote:
> Scot
> 
> I checked my ls version versus your info and it matches.  Thanks for
> your response.  I relearned a couple of other important lessons here.  
> 
> 1. Check other maillist for leads, and
> 2. Check the program developer's site for the latest stable release and
> notes on its use or limitations
> 3. Keep these security and virus programs uptodate!
> 
> I assume that since the chkrootkit-0.43 gave no indication of warnings
> or infections, that my system is ok.  But you know what they say about
> the word assume.
> 
> Norm

All excellent points to keep in mind!

Yes, I would think you are ok.  The ls infected thing had me a little
worried but then I am more than a little paranoid about this stuff. :)

I went through the scramble the first time I ran chkrootkit on a Fedora
system and got that report.  After researching it for an hour I figured
out what was going on and was able to relax a little.

For this stuff it is always better to ask questions and question the
answers until you understand it.

-- 
Scot L. Harris
webid@xxxxxxxxxx

If voting could change the system, it would be illegal.  If not voting
could change the system, it would be illegal. 



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux