Am Fr, den 23.07.2004 schrieb James Marcinek um 19:52: > Any pro's/cons to these. Is dovecot similar (in the manner which it > stores emails) to the previous imapd? I'm using the cyrus-imapd for > OpenGroupware and would lose some functionality if I used something > like the old wu-imapd... > James dovecot is able to use mbox as well as maildir format. So if coming from uw-imapd dovecot is the best choice. If you like and need the power and advanced features of cyrus-imapd - and you have the knowledge and skill to administer that peace of mailserver software - choose that one. That when upgrading FC1 to FC2 the cyrus-imapd is installed is an accident by the system. As with a fresh new install uw-imapd should be exchanged by dovecot. Alexander P.S. Please post plain text mails to this list James, no html formatted stuff. It even triggers the SPAM detection by the Redhat mail system, as you can easily see from your mail headers: X-RedHat-Spam-Warning: 6.219 (******) HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET, MIME_HTML_ONLY, RATWARE_HASH_2, RATWARE_HASH_2_V2 -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.6-1.435.2.3.ad.umlsmp Serendipity 20:01:19 up 1 day, 4:49, load average: 0.19, 0.25, 0.27
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
