Am Di, den 20.07.2004 schrieb Bryan White um 17:47: > Here is the output of the route command: > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface > 209.96.210.64 * 255.255.255.192 U 0 0 0 eth0 > 169.254.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 > 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo > default jumpgate 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 > default jumpgate 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 > default jumpgate 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 > default jumpgate 0.0.0.0 UG 1 0 0 eth0 > default jumpgate 0.0.0.0 UG 1 0 0 eth0 5 default routes? Does no harm but is a sign of misconfiguration. Don't set the GATEWAY in each ifcfg-ethX config file but globally in /etc/sysconfig/network. > I don't see anything the the route command man page that suggests it has > anything to do with selecting the default source address of a outbound > connection. The routing is destination based. > Bryan White, ArcaMax Inc. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.6-1.435.2.3.ad.umlsmp Serendipity 17:54:49 up 21:46, 9 users, 0.93, 0.60, 0.35
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
