Re: It isn't what RHL 5.2 was

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: It isn't what RHL 5.2 was
From: Rob Brown-Bayliss <rbb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:44:58 +1200
In-reply-to: <1090120437l.4623l.2l@cornette-fc2>
References: <1090120437l.4623l.2l@cornette-fc2>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 15:13, Jim Cornette wrote:

I picked the 3com NIC because of confidence that the card was Linux  
compatible.

Like wise, I chose Nvidia because I knew they made linux drivers, I chose a realtek nic because I knew from experience that it worked with linux. All the hardware worked crashless on RH8, exact same box. I agree there must a be a problem but wish I knew what it was.




--




Rob Brown-Bayliss






I haven't been wrong since 1981, when I thought I made a mistake.

References:
- It isn't what RHL 5.2 was
  - From: Jim Cornette

Prev by Date: Re: KVM Trouble, Mouse Gone Wild
Next by Date: Re: (no subject)
Previous by thread: It isn't what RHL 5.2 was
Next by thread: Re: It isn't what RHL 5.2 was
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]