Re: Spamassassin timing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 03:16, Thomas Bitschnau wrote:

> Ok, I took a closer look and the information provided by me, was not
> correct.
> 
> There is a difference between DNS and DNS::NBL.
> 
> We are talking about DNS-lookups, I described DNS::NBL-lookups.
> 
> DNS-lookups uses DNS-banlists, which are checked with every tested mail
> and this takes some time.  I think this is, what takes so long on some
> systems.
> 
> PS: I hope this is it now! :-)
> 
> Greetings,

Could the systems having a long delay have an issue with IPv6?  Have
seen a number issues with DNS lookups that appear to be resolved if IPv6
is either configured correctly or disabled completely.  

Just a thought.

Have been using spamassassin for well over a year and it has been
great.  Highly recommended.  And if anyone is operating a full blown
email server I highly recommend checking out greylisting.  This has
reduced spam at my site from 3000 to 6000 spam messages a day to 6 or 8
spam messages.  And those get trapped by spamassassin.

-- 
Scot L. Harris
webid@xxxxxxxxxx

Economists can certainly disappoint you.  One said that the economy would
turn up by the last quarter.  Well, I'm down to mine and it hasn't.
		-- Robert Orben 



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux