On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 16:17, Nifty Hat Mitch wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:23:20PM -0400, jludwig wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 18:32, Nifty Hat Mitch wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 01:01:47PM -0400, damon fister wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Sort of like 'info'. > > > > > Please Please don't base it on emacs. > > Info is not emacs. > Some of the key strokes for the interface are emacs flavored. > But your point is well taken. Emacs and xemacs have grown to the > point that it is too almost big. > > A current markup language that can be viewed on multiple platforms > (like html) is the way to go. It would be good to permit a windowZ > user to pop in a tutorial CDROM and do some homework and preperation. > > Some interactive stuff could eventually be done in java or javascript. > > I am a fan of the php documentation. I very much like the facility > for annotations that reviewers have. Most of the php questions I have > had have their answers in the annotations. The "oh by the way" check > this when you use this function stuff has been very helpfull. > > The other choice is to join or host a WIKI that facilitates this > project. > > > > -- > T o m M i t c h e l l > /dev/dull where most of what I type originates. Very much agree. You should not need a tutorial to use a tutorial, and very simple, intuitive, and easy to use. -- jludwig <wralphie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
