Re: nvidia and gl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 10:29:27AM -0500, Jeff Vian wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 06:53, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> > Jeff Vian wrote:
> > ...
> > > My entire xorg.conf file can be sent if needed.
> > 
> > The /var/log/Xorg.0.log file would be more interesting.
> > 
> > Mogens

> Sorry if this becomes a duplicate.  I sent it but another message I
It did...

> The xorg.0/log follows:
> --------------

That looks as if the right driver has loaded
now look at the libraries that get loaded.
What do you see if you do this:
    $ strace -f -o /tmp/trace-glxgears glxgears
    472 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1024.400 FPS
    $ grep lib /tmp/trace-glxgears
    6018  open("/usr/lib/libGL.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 3
    ....

The key is that non of the libraries should be Mesa GL libraries.  I
recently did a "by the numbers reinstall" of the nVidia package because
a Mesa update conflict with libraries.   Not only a kernel update
but Mesa and other X11 libs will invite a reinstall.

Watch out for tls libs.  Some funky stuff was going on with those 
libs.

-- 
	T o m  M i t c h e l l 
	/dev/null the ultimate in secure storage.



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux