On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 10:38, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am Sa, den 10.07.2004 schrieb Doug Maurer um 16:27: > > > I know this question has probably been ask before, but googling hasn't > > helped. Using when trying to ftp into or out of a FC2 box fc2>fc1 or > > fc1>fc2, I get > > 227 Entering Passive Mode (x,x,x,x,199,244) (x=the exact ip) > > ftp: connect: No route to host > > I can log in fine, but as soon I do a ls, I get that message. > > > > can anyone either point me in the right direction or provide a fix for > > this > > > Doug Maurer > > That comes from a firewalled or/and NATed ftp server. Following site > illustrates the differences > > http://slacksite.com/other/ftp.html > > You may either use active ftp mode with the client - if the firewall > does allow that -, you may check if using NAT whether ip_conntrack_ftp > and ip_nat_ftp modules are loaded or you may need to setup proper > iptables rules to allow the desired FTP connections. > > Alexander I've tried both modprobe's for ip_conntrack_ftp and ip_nat_ftp I then brought both my systems iptables back to default except I left ports 20/21 open. (these systems are 1000 miles apart.) I can now ssh into my FC1 box and ftp back to the FC2 box, but when i try to just ftp from FC2 to the FC1 I still get the no route to host error. I never had this problem when they were both FC1. So I'm not sure what has changed, both have the same looking iptables and vsftpd.conf files. -- Doug Maurer doug@xxxxxxxxxxx Linux User #299439
