Hmmm.....I'm on a HT enabled Dell 9100 laptop running ndiswrapper, no problem.......Oh yea, when I do compile with the -jN option the HT really does pay off! C On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 09:43, Phil Hannent wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jon Fanti wrote: > > | Hi guys, > | > | We've started buying replacement servers for our aging equipment > | here (it took a while to squeeze the money out of the bean > | counters!), most of the new equipment is coming with HT (Hyper > | Threading)-enabled Xeon or P4 CPUs. Is it worth using HT with FC2? > | Mostly our servers are running apache and MySQL plus some PHP > | scripts. I can't find any where that says I should/shouldn't enable > | HT. What's the general recommendation? I'm tempted to just turn it > | off unless I am likely to notice a nice big performance gain from > | leaving it on? > > Hi, > > I have a HT enabled laptop and I have noticed a slight improvement > when multitasking. Only downside I have had is with kernel modules > like ndiswrapper that don't support 2 CPUs. For server use it should > be just what the doctor ordered. > > When looking to buy a HT enabled computer I came across this great > example of performance: > > http://www.2cpu.com/articles/41_4.html > > Regards > Phil Hannent > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFA4sNlTpmHsAbXf9ARAnlwAJ44ZVwQ5A43PMrDW4o2lJNhaFC8hgCgvbTy > wvv0n4HhEDh7dHVZu4XDY34= > =Ws7c > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
